Investor Relations
Proof-of-Unity + Multi-Group DAG: 125,274 TPS verified on €600 consumer hardware.
No stake requirement. Testnet active. Security audit completed. Remediation in progress.
The Layer 1 blockchain market has reached its natural limits. High-performance networks (Solana, Avalanche) require validators with enterprise hardware costing $20,000–$200,000 and minimum stakes of tens of thousands of dollars. The result is formal but not substantive decentralization: a small number of datacenters in a small number of jurisdictions controls the most-used "decentralized" networks.
Savitri flips the problem by shifting the constraint.
Instead of optimizing software for increasingly powerful hardware, we optimize the protocol
for already-distributed hardware: the 6.8 billion smartphones and billions of laptops and desktops
already in people's hands.
Proof-of-Unity evaluates nodes on the quality of their behavior, not on the quantity of capital.
The Multi-Group DAG processes 16+ chains in parallel, scaling throughput with the number of nodes.
The result: 125,274 TPS on a €600 laptop, with deterministic finality in less than 0.5ms.
The window to build the L1 infrastructure of the next cycle is open. Ethereum is saturated and expensive.
Solana has a history of outages and a validation model that excludes 99% of users.
Second-generation L1s (Sui, Aptos) solve throughput but replicate the validator
centralization problem.
Savitri is the only L1 designed with consumer hardware as the starting assumption,
not as an afterthought.
Savitri does not compete only in the "fast" blockchain market. The consumer hardware thesis opens three vertical markets that existing L1s cannot structurally serve.
Opportunity: The global blockchain infrastructure market was estimated at $17.6B in 2023 with a CAGR of ~66% (Grand View Research). The demand for high-performance, low-validation-cost L1s is structural and growing.
Savitri positioning: The only L1 with consumer-grade nodes as a design requirement, not as a post-hoc simplification. This creates a structural advantage in node acquisition: the cost of acquiring a validator is zero stake, vs $20,000–$200,000 for competitors.
Source: Grand View Research, 2023 · [to be updated with verified source]
Opportunity: The IoT market was at $662B in 2023 (Fortune Business Insights). The unsolved problem: no existing blockchain can handle the transaction volume of millions of IoT devices at acceptable fee costs (sub-cent per transaction).
Savitri meets the technical requirements for this market:
Concrete verticals: Supply chain, P2P energy metering, industrial device authentication, verifiable telemetry, smart city infrastructure.
Source: Fortune Business Insights, 2023 · [to be updated]
Opportunity: An emerging but structural market: billions of devices with unused computing power in private hands. The model has already been validated at small scale by Helium (hotspots), Filecoin (storage), and Render (GPU compute).
Savitri generalizes this model to the consensus layer: anyone with a device can become network infrastructure and receive rewards proportional to participation quality.
The TAM is every smartphone (6.8B) and laptop (2B) on the planet. The current SAM (testnet) is 15 nodes — we are at day 0 of this curve.
A technological competitive advantage exists only if it is difficult to replicate in the medium term. Here is why Savitri's architectural choices create a real moat.
This is not a feature added later — it is a design assumption that permeates every layer of the protocol (QUIC/UDP networking optimized for home connections, battery modes in the client, PoU scoring that tolerates normal consumer interruptions).
A competitor like Solana cannot "add consumer hardware support" without rewriting the consensus protocol from scratch.
"Replicating this architecture would require 2-3 years of development and would mean publicly admitting a structural deficit."
PoU is an original consensus mechanism that combines behavioral metrics (uptime, integrity, participation, latency) into a unified score with exponential decay.
S(t) = 0.3 × S(t-1) + 0.7 × Σ(w_k × component_k)
Creates a Sybil-resistant system that does not depend on staking. No competitor uses this approach. The formal whitepaper (in preparation) will constitute the academic documentation of this innovation.
"The mechanism can be studied and copied, but the implementation and mature Rust codebase create a significant time advantage."
Most blockchains scale vertically (more powerful hardware) or horizontally with sharding (enormous complexity).
The Multi-Group DAG scales horizontally in an organic way: each new group of nodes adds parallel capacity. Throughput grows linearly with participation.
This creates a flywheel: more users → more nodes → more TPS → better UX → more users.
"The DAG structure is known (see IOTA, Fantom), but the combination with PoU and consumer hardware is unique."
The Savitri core codebase is written in Rust 1.82+ without unsafe blocks — verifiable via grep in the public repository. Comparison: Solana has extensive unsafe code in its core, which has contributed to several outages and vulnerabilities.
The combination of safe Rust + external audit + public remediation is rare in the industry. 64+ test suites (E2E, stress, fuzz, security) document the robustness of the implementation.
"Code quality is a reputational and operational advantage, not a structural moat. But it reinforces all the others."
Every metric here is verifiable from the primary source.
The link to the benchmark repository is available for independent reproduction.
TPS benchmarks were run on a single physical host. With real distributed hardware, sustained TPS will be affected by network latency — distributed network tests are planned for Phase 2. Full scripts and logs available in the repository.
The right question is not "who is faster?" It is "who can scale while maintaining real decentralization?"
| Ethereum | Solana | Avalanche | Sui | SAVITRI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPS | ~15 | ~65,000 | ~4,500 | ~120,000 * | 125,274 ★ |
| Finality | 12–15 min | ~400ms | ~1–2s | ~500ms | < 0.5ms ★ |
| Block time | 12s | 400ms | 1–2s | ~100ms | 150ms |
| Min. hardware | 32GB RAM | 128GB RAM | Enterprise | Enterprise | 4GB RAM ★ |
| Minimum stake | 32 ETH | ~$20K+ | 2K AVAX | SUI stake | Zero ★ |
| Validator cost | ~$50K+ | ~$20K+ | ~$15K+ | ~$10K+ | ~€600 ★ |
| Node decentraliz. | High | Medium | Medium | Low | High (by design) ★ |
| IoT support | ✗ | Partial | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ native |
| Mobile node | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ iOS + Android ★ |
| Unsafe core code | No | Yes | No | No | Zero ★ |
| Public audit | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (68 findings) |
| Consensus | PoS | PoH+PoS | Avalanche | BFT+PoS | PoU+BFT ★ |
| Smart contracts | EVM | custom | EVM | Move VM | Savitri-20/721/1155 |
Competitor data are publicly documented values updated as of Q1 2026. Savitri benchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, reproducible tests in the repository. Sui benchmarks include * because they were conducted in controlled environments not directly comparable. ★ indicates a verifiable differentiating advantage.
Savitri does not compete on a single axis (TPS). It competes at the intersection of three axes where no one
is positioned: high performance + low hardware + zero minimum stake.
This combination cannot be optimized on existing architectures without a complete redesign
of the consensus protocol.
For complete documentation: /tokenomics
Here we present the structure relevant for investment valuation.
100,000,000 SAVI — Fixed cap, hardcoded, unmodifiable.
Verifiable in tokens.toml,
public repository.
Note: previous site communications indicated "2 billion" — incorrect figure. The correct supply is 100M.
50% of every fee is permanently burned. 50% goes to the treasury for grants and development.
In a network with sufficient volume, the burn rate exceeds the net reward release to nodes — the circulating supply tends to decrease over time.
Nodes receive SAVI from treasury distribution, not from new issuance (no inflation).
VOTE is not an investment token — it cannot be purchased.
It is earned by staking SAVI: 10,000 SAVI → 1,000 VOTE.
Used for on-chain governance of the protocol and treasury. Does not create inflationary pressure on SAVI.
The detailed distribution (team, treasury, community, grants) will be published before mainnet with on-chain verifiable wallets. We do not publish percentages before they are locked and verifiable — doing so beforehand is a non-binding promise.
Confirmed mainnet distribution (Tokenomics v1.2 · March 2026):
Staking & Validators: 42% · Team & Advisors: 11% (72m vesting) · Ecosystem Grants: 9% · DAO Treasury: 4% · Investors: 18% · Liquidity, Marketing & Community: 16%
125,274 TPS · 392 blocks · 0 forks · Security audit completed
Target: 100 distributed nodes · mobile app · complete security remediation
Final audit · whitepaper v1.0 · exchange listing preparation
Public network · cross-chain bridge · 1,000+ consumer nodes
For the complete roadmap with detailed milestone criteria: /roadmap →
We are not ready for mainnet. We know it. This page exists because serious investors
prefer clarity over performative optimism.
Investing now means investing in a team and an architecture, not in a finished product.
If this distinction is clear to both parties, it makes sense to talk.
Team profiles will be published in this section before the mainnet launch.
For institutional investors requiring team information during due diligence, contact:
The team responds with complete and verifiable information in confidential form to qualified investors.
Contact the team →12 slides. Thesis, market, technology, team, tokenomics, roadmap.
PDF · ~8MB
⬇ Request Pitch DeckVersion: March 2026 · Updated at each milestone
1 page. For the initial investment committee screening.
PDF · ~1MB
⬇ Request One-PagerFull report Feb 2026. 68 findings. Remediation status.
Published in full — no redactions
Materials are available for download without registration.
If you prefer to receive them by email with future updates:
[email protected]
For investment rounds, strategic partnerships, and advisory.
Response within 5 business days.
For due diligence, initial term sheets, and questions on tokenomics and legal structure.
Write →Book a 30-minute exploratory call with the leadership team.
Write to us with your availability and timezone.
Book a call →Nothing on this page constitutes an investment offer. Investing in crypto assets involves high risks including the total loss of invested capital. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.